O (not) the correct representation and problems of the social agenda in the media<\/h1>\n

March 8 – the holiday is largely dual. Anyone who is closer to modern realities will rather congratulate on the “day of the solidarity of women in many countries in the struggle for equal rights and
emancipation \u201d, and supporters of a more conservative position will talk about\u201c the day of love, beauty and tenderness \u201d. But all this in the end is just two sides of one holiday. <\/p>\n

And there is no reason to talk about female superhero, a social agenda and the right representation in the context of world trends and modern mythology? And not only. <\/p>\n

2020 can be called the year of female superhero, as this year the largest number of films is released, where a woman-protagonist acts at the forefront. \u201cHarley Quinn: Predatory Birds\u201d (Harley, by the way, managed to distinguish her and here, since she had two solo projects in 20 and, in addition, unfortunately, a failure about the Antheroine company, who was united against the general enemy of the company, also the second season of the animated series, concentrated on Harley itself and its internal and external problems), Marvel\u2019s \u201cBlack Widow\u201d about about the Black Widow.The adventures of the now deceased Natasha Romanova and the second solo film about the Wonder Woman. And all this is in one year, and this is not mentioned about projects like “vandavizh”. <\/p>\n

A similar interest in promoting female characters is easy to understand, they can be physically strong, which gives them the opportunity to participate in spectacular action scenes, but at the same time to remain emotional, diluting a series of special effects with drama and humor, while not locking them within the exceptionally love interests of the main character. And this is a wonderful current trend that wins in two directions at once: the creators pushing or even completely destroy the old cliches and frames, and the audience receive an interesting character. The fact that if you have settled the \u201cJustice League\u201d from DC, from the moment of creating the Wonder Woman in 1941 and until 2017, she had not had a single complete solo project on the screen, although she was in popularity in the first three characters in the first three characters from the first three characters could be judged. Sometimes it comes to funny. A few years ago, Kevin Faygi, the father of the cinematic union and the head of the Marvel studio, threatened to leave in all seriousness if Disney did not give him the opportunity to shoot female sololets. He won the dispute, but Natasha Romanova did not live to her own sololet. <\/p>\n

Moreover, in terms of female characters and social agenda, the eternal confrontation of Marvel and DC acquires a particularly curious round. KVM (Kinovselnaya Marvel. author) develops at a great pace. They closed the infinity saga, consisting of 23 films, where each subsequent film was more popular than the previous one, and the saga finale became the most box office in history, launched a whole pile of potentially crazy and popular series on their own streaming service, investing huge budgets and freedom in production, while harmoniously wove them into the plot canvas of the future phasesKinovselnoye. But there is one point with which even the most ardent fans agree: <\/p>\n

Marvel does not know how to work with a social agenda.<\/em> <\/p>\n

Most likely this is a kind of inheritance from Disney, because if you pay attention to comics, then many of the most difficult questions and controversial moments represent softly and do not shove the readers in the face, and Disney is known for its desire to follow the social agenda as publicly as possible. So the comic situation is obtained, where Disney marketers boast of the characters Fem and LGBT+* representations, and DC simply introduces them. And he does it much more reasonably and friendly (unless you are an iceman of the X -Men). And if we compare Captain Marvel and the Wonder Woman or \u201cdeclared\u201d in the future \u201ceternal\u201d gay para and black mask, performed by Yuen McGregor, then the choice is obvious. <\/p>\n

The captain generally turned out very sadly. Initially, it was supposed to become the flagship of the fourth phase, but due to the wrong approach, the unsuccessful solo and disgusting behavior of Brig Larson, who is already planning to replace in another actress in the near future, the character was not loved by fans, but remained a kind of red rag and a source of endless heavy sighs. Still, it was originally a bad idea to build a film on one social agenda. The viewer goes to the film comics to have fun, and not so that he would be convinced for almost two hours of how bad he is. Plus purely outwardly a brig is not a very captain: there is no power and authority in it that was in the comics. Yes, and when Tom Holland and Jude Low in his pants in a prick look better than the main character, it somehow depresses. <\/p>\n

The same with the topic of racism. I liked the Black Panther, but not because of the raising of our latitudes of our latitudes, but because during the viewing I imagined that it was such a Live-explosion version of King Leo with living actors (this was before Disney made a remake and all my brilliant jesters on this topic lost their original. author). Plus there was an interesting antagonist, pretty and externally and history. He pushed two opposite crops. But the message again shoved with all his might. In the “Falcon and Winter Soldier” the topic will be raised again, and, something tells me, this will not benefit the series (I do not pretend to the truth in the last instance, in disputes about who will become a new capita, I was sick for Bucky. author). <\/p>\n

Let’s talk about the right representation?<\/b> <\/p>\n

What could be done so that the creators did not have to choose from two chairs and at the same time they could show everything correctly? For such a situation, I always have a quote from Van Helsing\u2019s film: <\/p>\n

“-If you want to kill someone-kill, and not talk in vain …”<\/em> <\/p>\n

Indeed, you want to show LGBT+ character? Well, show for health, you are filmmakers and screenwriters here, flag in your hands. Just do not make orientation the only important feature and do not turn it into an advertising banner. Prescribe your heroes, and do not shove a message about tolerance in the throat to the spectators. Yes, you will do much more for the community if the character is not flat by caricature or stereotype. <\/p>\n

Marvel began so well: Valkyrie and Loki – two bisexual characters, not burdened with a message or a tortured love line. Although here it is worthwhile to admit that the Valkyrie was \u201coriginally\u201d positioned as Bi, and it is difficult to say now, we must wait for the promotional campaign of the fourth torus. And with Loki, in general, the devil will break his leg, in the comics he is either an old man, then a child, then a woman, then raises Melnir, and sometimes everything at the same time. Again, his series will soon be released and Lady Loki was already burned on the site, but there are no details yet in any case. <\/p>\n

With national minorities, this also works. Just write them well and show them. If the creators of “Spider-Man: through the universes” came out, then why don’t Marvel try. What if it even turns out. <\/p>\n

Just like in a witcher from nonflicks. Only the lazy did not speak out about the black elf, while forgetting for whom this series was shot at all (the guys come to terms, it was clearly not for the CIS, look at the truth of everyone). And in the dispute about historical accuracy, everyone abruptly forgets that Geralt’s pants from leatherette, he found a rocking chair somewhere in the Middle Ages, and the belt to grow bristles on the way apparently prohibits religion. (At the same time, that in wild hunting, all women’s non -pains are dressed much more freer than they should be modestly silent. After all, historical accuracy is such a one -sided thing) <\/p>\n

Golden mean.<\/b> <\/p>\n

Unfortunately, if in the media, and it doesn\u2019t matter in games, in films or series, there is the main character, then most likely she is or \u201cstrong independent woman\u201d TM or so many that she wants to confuse her herself. But the reality is such that both this and that can be more likely to be perceived as mythical creatures, for such people do not exist. <\/p>\n

At one time, in the peak of my enthusiasm for teenage content, I happened to stumble on the series \u201cTwilight Hunters\u201d and in general he went to me, if not for one but: without sarcasm, the main character sobbed the first 4 episodes. Non-stop. Without a break for sleep and food. And this is the wrong character. <\/p>\n

Or take Tomb Raider. One of the last. Lara rather seems more likely a stone, an unemotional creature that does not touch anything. And this is also the wrong character. <\/p>\n

In an ideal world where there are strong strong plots in spelled out worlds, these two ladies would be part of one character. And playing for this character would be interesting. But this is in the ideal world of the golden mean, in which social layers do not know what characters need to be sculpted and do not actively share their opinions with the creators. Not that, do not give great demons, the heroine will joke or let a tear. And I will not say who is right in this situation, there is nothing good in radicality from both sides. And I equally cannot understand the creators whose female characters are created under those who are too lazy to google the nearest porn site, nor those feminists who live for hatred. Feminism is beautiful and it is needed, but for some reason a bunch of people completely forgets that it exists to struggle for its rights, and not for the oppression of strangers. <\/p>\n

So there with “good” characters?<\/b> <\/p>\n

Very good. We have Ellie from The Last of US, a beautiful strong emotional character that cannot be loved like a younger sister. And soon the second part is on the way and we will be able to continue to recognize it already older and a little older. <\/p>\n

And men’s characters are not standing still. The times of Dumgaev have already passed, silent and faceless. Now men can pass through their own drama, like Sebastian Castelanos, grief and printing are not so shameful. Characters can be broken, looking for their own path, overcoming. The frames extended for the main characters making them more alive. Conscious. And their emotionality is not one -sided, as was the case with the Farrecoevsky Vaas, who just went (but he is a villain and the villains are a separate story). <\/p>\n

Or for example, Cal Curtis from the Nonukcasinosites.co.uk\/5-pound-deposit\/<\/a> recent Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order. During the passage, we see him both joyful and wary, sad and incredulous, frightened and hoping. An amazing emotional range as for the character EA. Although maybe he just got a good actor, Cameron Moneyen over the years in the shameless and Gothema has already gone in this. <\/p>\n

In general, the industry continues to develop with seven-mile steps, then becoming an object of art, then being universal surprise by something much more than frivolous entertainment. She can afford more, show more and give players and viewers the experience that they had not met before. And I am glad that the characters, regardless of gender, race, sexual orientation, historical period, age and attitude to pizza with pineapples, can also develop freely to make our lives with them to spend our lives with them.<\/p>\n

* The activities of the International Public Movement of LGBT are recognized as extremist and is prohibited in the Russian Federation<\/p>\n

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt <\/h2>\n

The Evil Within <\/h2>\n

Rise of the Tomb Raider <\/h2>\n

The Last of Us: Part II <\/h2>\n

Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order <\/h2>\n

The best comments<\/h2>\n

Marvel began so well: Valkyrie and Loki – two bisexual characters, not burdened with a message or a tortured love line.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This is still garbage, compared to that madness of legends, when he became a horse, which the giant later fucked. This is I understand the story and social message from the Vikings. We have been gleeping all from that time. And the social agenda is the garbage, and have forgotten how to have forgotten ..<\/p>\n

The cartoon also went wildly to me, but there, unfortunately, not one plot with birds)<\/p>\n

In the cartoon, Harley is an anti -hero and goes from the unnecessary minion that has become no one needs, to the supervisor. She tries to compare and surpass, if possible, other supervisioneles, but her main motivation in the cartoon is to play with others in this game and stand on the same time with other villains. In fact, the heroine fights for her rights in this capacity. The fact that it is disappointed in the supervision league, and after some events, when the city loses all superheroes, it confronts it, in fact, faced with the most important thing that defeated everyone, in whose face not only this is represented, but all the bad and what needs to be struggled with, this is a separate story. But the fact that she had proved to everyone before that it could become such and to be crazy with everyone in that capacity is important.
Well, plus there, in general, to the fig of the stack over the whole society, mass culture, cliche of pop films … And indeed, it is easier to say what is not in this cartoon)<\/p>\n

And Harley in the film and all the \u201cantiheroini\u201d are not shown in the antiheroin system, and it was not by chance that I put \u201cgentlemen\u201d here. In fact, in the plot conway, where everyone should have been bad and eat each other, there are many girls who are clearly better and kinder than everyone with whom they are fighting, and therefore it is no coincidence that the team in the announcements is called the superheroeni group) is good that the Queen itself did not exalt the superheroini, but the path of development from the \u201charlequin without the owner\u201d was very small, and she would have been lifted up and entertained independently.all. In fact, just live in a high for yourself. And … this is not bad, but comparing with the cartoon – it cannot be compared. Yes, maybe this is due to the timing. But and comparing with the “gentlemen” is weak, because there is just the anti -Heroes of the whole film trying to devour or nurse each other. They do not need to make excuses and seem higher, that\u2019s the joke. Well, the fact that there are enough for the film raised there. Even surprisingly, taking into account the fact that it goes only 1.5 hours)<\/p>\n

Well, it is worth explaining, of course, why here in this way I decided to touch the “birds”.After all, the topic of improper representation and the problem of social. A summons. The film may be liked or not like, but it is important to understand why it is flaw. In your opinion, why?)<\/p>\n

No) the birds were not prompted for this) and flaunted just from Fema, for the most part.<\/p>\n

There is a great idea of \u200b\u200bfeminism. The struggle for their rights of women in the male, so it was necessary, society is necessary. It is necessary to achieve equality in society and look not at the gender, but at the professionalism of a person, and in any business, and evaluate it, regardless of the gender, sexual or racial distinctive feature.<\/p>\n

Imagine that the film will be released now, with sparkling humor, an excellent acting, an unusual plot and a multimillion budget. But in this film, all the main and obviously good characters will perform white Europeans who will break the bones with particular cruelty and irritate the skulls with iron bits only black characters, who will be in the film all the freaks of everything. What do you think will undermine in order to destroy it for such?)<\/p>\n

So the film Margot and Ko crossed this border with the presentation of the femo-list, in fact perverting the idea of \u200b\u200bfeminism to radical. This was very smoothed out by the humor and character of the quinn itself, but these excesses are very well visible in the picture.<\/p>\n

I’m sorry because I really liked the film. And I compare the cartoon and the film, because there is essentially one plot, which is better disclosed in the cartoon due to the timing and lack of a heap of other characters.
I also like a cartoon wildly, especially chemistry between Harley and Ivy. Plus, psychoanalysis is delightful when Harley suddenly recalls that she is by the way a psychologist, but in the cartoon and this is done more consciously.<\/p>\n

In fact, initially I wanted to write about female superhero (since March 8 I wanted to speculate on this topic) and then the more I thought the farther and more globally described, hence such an emphasis at the beginning on Harley (especially because this film has already come out and we can talk about its final quality) and on the widow). Plus, there is also a podcast that we recorded at the end of the viewing and there the topic of the similarity of the Mult and the film was separate.<\/p>\n

I had high hopes for the film, and I liked it purely at the expense of music, pictures, hyena and Yuen McGregor (taking into account the unreason)<\/p>\n

Well, to compare Harley with gentlemen is to initially take films of different weight categories. It is more worth comparing the middle lousy of birds with the middle lousy of the suicide detachment. And I would compare the gentlemen with the agents of the ankl. So honest.<\/p>\n

I compared these films exclusively on the topic of the blog, isolated from everything else) just cap Marvel, like a film, an ordinary superhero, largely passing, but ordinary. Of course, BRA, of course, was brought to him, wherever possible, and where it is impossible to say that she is a straight female fem and arranging scandals out of the blue, but the film, I repeat, did not make sense. But “birds” is a precedent and a phenomenon from which I even in Ah … E was a little. And by the way, I don\u2019t have Heych or hate him for this, he largely because of this and rolled up, in fact) with his radicality and the declaration of war x … he am a lot of fuckers, but I generally come in a lot of incorrect.<\/p>\n

But I will not argue with your addition, you are in many ways right and all this also had a place to be (except for the last rumors that I have not heard about). I generally wonder what target audience the creators of the “birds” counted when they invested millions in the film)<\/p>\n

So let’s discuss.<\/p>\n

I completely agree. The variety of characters began to spread yet (accurately) since the 90s and most likely from the 80s, when the blacks have already defended their basic rights and began to expand them (the same with women). But. In the article I am talking about the main characters. And if you noticed, I talked about the original main characters and not about the deliberately changed (I about Hermione because it is fucked up after 20 years, Rowling boil)<\/p>\n

With LGBT* by the way it is more difficult. In this regard, we have a gap with the conditional America just in the 30 years and in the 90s in \u201cFree America\u201d even for mentioning LGBT on TV could sit down for a very long time. The situation was changed by Helen Dedenery, she was the insanely popular television star, but when she confessed to her orientation, the next 10 years she was crossed out of all possible lists. She was simply not shown. But the people have already woke up and realized that it is impossible. And since then, this topic stopped silence.<\/p>\n

A separate interesting thing is the law \u201cDon\u2019t ask, don\u2019t say\u201d but here google is to help you if interesting.<\/p>\n

I do not agree. Comics have a long story. And the same Cap for his expelled went a long way from such patriotism on his legs to a character with the inner drama of a man not in his place. Yes, he even managed to stay with a hydra agent. But this is one character. (About how it is not necessary to develop the characters, I talked by mentioning the anissman)<\/p>\n

In addition, the further the comics developed, the more the old -timers had competition (as well as in cinema, games, and so on) and they could no longer show the same thing again and again. They could develop plots or expand the variety of characters or, etc. But there are a final amount and come up with something really new is difficult. And you can play with the characters. Like the same Loki. (And Loki is also a tricster his plot appearance and internal message can be turned as you want. Hence such a variety)<\/p>\n

And about the black panther, here I also went out to IMHO. I enjoyed the film itself and not the agenda. And I don’t like the attitude towards him from society. He was given an Oscar, although there were better and better. But they gave him because the film is about black.<\/p>\n

* The activities of the International Public Movement of LGBT are recognized as extremist and is prohibited in the Russian Federation<\/p>\n

If it were not for the very structure of the film “Birds” and its attempts to seem to be a criminal comedy, with elements of a parody, I would not compare, really)<\/p>\n

However, okay, the last question was from me just on your topic. Why the “birds” flaunted more for their femo-tapping than the captain, in your opinion? After all, then the film paid off and earned well. Yes, in many ways, he was saved by the expectation of the second part of the war of infinity, but still critics, and the audience met him exactly. But there are no “birds”, and he barely paid off.<\/p>\n

They can take off. “Get knives” a good example. Ryan Johnson took a great detective. At the same time, he worked on the 8th episode of the saga, which is so -so. In the first case, the heroine goes through and develops. In the second Rey Sue. One person and shot completely different films.
Such a towers covered fairly famous franchises. In an attempt to take possession of all the money in the world, marketers decided to attract an unconventional audience for the genre. At the same time, they are not won for the bulk. For they are cheating.<\/p>\n

I agree with many in the article. However, I will add from myself that on feminism and inclusiveness they are trying to earn. Therefore, we get shocked for the sake of the agenda of the characters, heroines, who can everyone and they admire them not for their qualities and talents, but for the fact that she is all so \u201cunusual\u201d. For me, a complete failure in terms of the heroine is Rei from the new Star Warrior trilogy. How was an omnipotent and idealized garbage man who is able to defeat anyone without learning. So she remained. About the “captain”, then yes. Carol was better shown in comics, and in the film – she is not what, unlike a miracle of a woman from DC films. For me, with the representative of a strong woman, things were good in the 80s and 90s. And also in the 2000s and the first half of 2010s.<\/p>\n

I have the feeling that somewhere a gap in American education. Somewhere in the beginning-end of the tenth, the change of generations of scriptwriters began, and the old pros began to leave, and no one came to replace them. Plus the most severe Western censorship finished everything.<\/p>\n

I’m more about this piece:<\/p>\n

Strange and not at all like him, but Loki did not appear to reap fame. No one knew where he went, although there were rumors that in the meadows for Asgard they saw a certain mare – beautiful and bay. Most of Loki did not show up to his eyes, and when it still seemed, a preho-naked gray foal was trodden after him.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Yes, and really preho -native – although his legs turned out to be eight instead of the usual four. He followed Loki everywhere, poked his nose, caressed and generally behaved like Loki – his own mother. Wasn’t that and the point?<\/p>\n

Over time, he grew up in a huge gray stallion named Slaipnir – the fastest and strongest of all that he had seen the light, for this horse could even overtake the wind.<\/p>\n

Loki presented Slaipnir – the best horse of all that live in the middle of the gods and people – as a gift from Odin.<\/p>\n

Many admired the horse of Odin, but only desperately brave would dare to discuss his pedigree in the presence of Loki, and no one would have decided to mention that twice. Believe me, Loki will turn inside out to ruin your life, if you only hear that you are chatting about how he sung Swadilfari away from the owner and saved the gods from the consequences of his own bad advice. Oh, Loki remembers resentment for a long time.Strange and not at all like him, but Loki did not appear to reap fame. No one knew where he went, although there were rumors that in the meadows for Asgard they saw a certain mare – beautiful and bay. Most of Loki did not show up to his eyes, and when it still seemed, a preho-naked gray foal was trodden after him.<\/p>\n

Yes, and really preho -native – although his legs turned out to be eight instead of the usual four. He followed Loki everywhere, poked his nose, caressed and generally behaved like Loki – his own mother. Wasn’t that and the point?<\/p>\n

Over time, he grew up in a huge gray stallion named Slaipnir – the fastest and strongest of all that he had seen the light, for this horse could even overtake the wind.<\/p>\n

Loki presented Slaipnir – the best horse of all that live in the middle of the gods and people – as a gift from Odin.<\/p>\n

Many admired the horse of Odin, but only desperately brave would dare to discuss his pedigree in the presence of Loki, and no one would have decided to mention that twice. Believe me, Loki will turn inside out to ruin your life, if you only hear that you are chatting about how he sung Swadilfari away from the owner and saved the gods from the consequences of his own bad advice. Oh, Loki remembers resentment for a long time.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Basically because the captain did not collect the audience with a naked godopa.<\/p>\n

And most of the bird spectators came to look at the naked Margo Robbie and broke off because they ended up in the action picture with Fem Orientation<\/p>\n

Here are the birds and flaunted<\/p>\n

All of the above shows that in the film industry the crisis and the absence of professialism. It feels like marketers watch a sample on the first five tweets.<\/p>\n

And you read the Scandinavian myths? I have a book behind the authorship of Neil Gaiman, where he describes these myths in modern language. And the myth about the wall, especially the part where Loki returns after a while modestly silent where he got the foal, and the Asgard gods are afraid to ask him something not to run into this every time a hysteria.
And plus the story where they passed the Torah for the bride dressing in the dress<\/p>\n

As usual, the master went that evening with his horse Swadilfari for stones. And suddenly from the woods to meet them with a calling neighing, the ocular mare jumped up. The horse noticed her and seemed to be furious, broke off, he settled behind her, and both disappeared into the forest.<\/p>\n

<\/i><\/p>\n

Horses were worn all night, and the work remained in the same place. Much less than necessary, was done the next day. I saw the mason that he could not finish him only for the deadline, and came into rabies. Asas did not wait until the giant rage collapses on them, they called the Torah, their main defender. Immediately appeared Thor, his terrible hammer soared in the air and smashed the skull to smithereens. The giant went into the depths of Nidlheim, an underground country.<\/p>\n

The appearance of a horse of the slalipnir. The mare who ran with Swadilfari was Loki. Like other gods, he knew how to contact animals, birds and fish. This time he had to become a mare, and therefore a few time later he brought the foal of Slaipnir. The foal was a gray suit, about eight legs, and neither gods nor people have seen better the horse.<\/i> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

O (not) the correct representation and problems of the social agenda in the media March 8 – the holiday is<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4670],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23399","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-post"],"lang":"zh","translations":{"zh":23399},"pll_sync_post":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/cloud.mbsposhk.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23399","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/cloud.mbsposhk.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/cloud.mbsposhk.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cloud.mbsposhk.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cloud.mbsposhk.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23399"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/cloud.mbsposhk.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23399\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23400,"href":"https:\/\/cloud.mbsposhk.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23399\/revisions\/23400"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/cloud.mbsposhk.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23399"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cloud.mbsposhk.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23399"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/cloud.mbsposhk.com\/test\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23399"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}